Monday, September 8, 2008
Carnival of Trust

 Trust Matters RSS

sign up here to receive blog posts by email
Privacy Policy


Email cgreen [at] trustedadvisor [dot] com

Recent Comments

People Are Talking

Blogroll

Blogchive

Third-Party Blog Services


Charles H. Green's Trust Matters

previous entry | return to blog index | next entry

Great Moments in Marketing Fear

by Charles H. Green on Friday, August 8, 2008 (post #328)


AvoidanceI may not be a marketer by profession, but I doubt I’d get much argument from the pros about what sells best—reliably, dependably, year in and year out.

Sex. And fear.

Maybe sex is number one. But if so, it's not by much.  Fear of fill-in-the-blank. Being left behind. Being left out. Not getting the joke. Looking dumb. Dressing wrong. Knowing the wrong people. Doing the wrong thing. Not doing the right thing. Being stuck with something that smells. Having a house that smells. Being the smell.

Identifying the right “pitch” or “hook” is, I suspect, even more important for fear-based products. Case in point: a particularly clever new product.

Introducing Slydial—see the August 2 New York Times article, Don’t Want to Talk About It? Order a Missed Call, by Matt Richtel:

When Alexis Gorman, 26, wanted to tell a man she had been dating that the courtship was over, she felt sending a Dear John text message was too impersonal. But she worried that if she called the man, she would face an awkward conversation or a confrontation.

So she found a middle ground. She broke it off in a voice mail message, using new technology that allowed her to jump directly to the suitor’s voice mail, without ever having to talk to the man — or risk his actually answering the phone.

The technology, called Slydial, lets callers dial a mobile phone but avoid an unwanted conversation — or unwanted intimacy — on the other end. The incoming call goes undetected by the recipient, who simply receives the traditional blinking light or ping that indicates that a voice mail message has been received.

Genius. Elegant in its simplicity. The sweet relief of being able to plausibly lie and avoid conflict at the same time.  It's calling when you know someone will be out—squared.

Where does this fit in the pantheon of problem-solving inventions? It’s gotta be up there with Get Out of Jail Free cards, the morning-after pill, the hangover pill (slot as yet unfilled), homework-eating dogs, and the deus ex machina plotline.

Because almost all our worst fears involve other humans. Fear of being eaten alive in the forest by bears? Chicken——, compared to the mortification of a teenager shunned by peers. Hearing Sister Mary say you’ll rot in hell for doing whatever it was you already did. Receiving a dear John call. Calling dear John.

Slydial is unique only in one tiny detail. You already have access to voicemail. You can already send digitized voice messages. Slydial’s tiny tweak is the shortcut straight to voicemail, unbeknownst to the receiver. It is the caller’s equivalent of caller ID or spam filters. One small step for technology—one giant leap for Freudkind.

Because this permits the caller to lie. Plausibly.

The caller’s lie is this: “Hey, I tried to call you, but you were out. So I guess I’ll just have to leave this message on voicemail—not that I want to, gosh I hate to do this kind of thing so impersonally. Sorry about that, but—well, it wasn’t my fault. So, anyway, hey—I’m breaking up with you. I couldn’t make it into work today. The dog ate my homework. About your party, you know, pre-existing commitment. We’ll do lunch another time. Sorry I missed your birthday.”

All without that distaste that accompanies having to talk to the Other.

Seinfeld’s George Costanza—the patron saint of avoidance—would have loved Slydial. His spiritual progenitor, Larry David, would know just how to market it. Perhaps Slydial’s owner, MobileSphere, should hire David to consult, based on this from the article:

MobileSphere’s co-founder, Gavin Macomber, said the tool was a time-saver in a world in which conversations could waste time, whereas voice mail can get directly to the point. Part of the reason people are so overwhelmed, Mr. Macomber said, is because they are connected to devices and streams of data around the clock.

Puh-leeze. Alexis Gorman knows better. She works in marketing, and says of her Dear John slydial, “I can do without the drama…I wanted to avoid an awkward conversation.”

So does Manny Mamakis, also quoted in the article as finding it a time-saver. But then Manny speaks the Truth:

“It does make you more cowardly,” he said.

Slydial’s effectiveness—like Borat or Punk’d—depends on being relatively unknown. It loses power once it goes mass-market. “You rat, don’t think you can Slydial me!

I predict a meteoric—albeit short-lived—success for Slydial. Anything that feeds fear of other people will sell well. Sex it up and the sky’s the limit.

Sometimes fear sells you what you actually do need—say, the morning after pill.  But other times it sells you the illusion of what you need.  What you need is usually closure, not avoidance.  

 



Charles H. Green, author of Trust-Based Selling and co-author of The Trusted Advisor, is a consultant and speaker on trust issues for some of the world's best companies. He has written about trust in business relationships at Trust Matters since 2006. Read more...


posted in Trust in Leadership Development and Strategy, Trust-based Selling

0 Trackbacks

trackback url: http://trustedadvisor.com/trackback.php?id=395



2 Comments

barbara garabedian said

Charlie:

Could society possibly come up w/ any more gizmos to keep people from speaking & listening to each other ??? This is the height of cowardice!!!!  This is nirvana come true for the techie that would rather cut off their arm than have a "live" conversation w/ another person.

posted on Friday, August 8, 2008

peter vajda said

www.spiritheart.net

The basic conscious or unconscious motive is to "hide", the result of being unable to connect emotionally with another...notwithstanding the denials and rationalizations that this is "the best way" to connect in this instance. More like dis-connect, on a deeper level.

The message below the voice mail message  is: "Hey, I need to be emotionally distant since I dont' have a clue about my own relationship with my own self or my own emotions...so I need a way to 'not connect'."

I'll bet that this isn't only about breaking off relationships, or about "business matters."

I'll bet a dollar that patners and spouses will soon be "leaving messages" to avoid the discomfort that comes with their inability to be open and honest in dealing with one another..in dealing openly with conflict...in telling one's spouse/partner "I'll be home late, don't wait up...", or "I'm sorry I..."; the guilt-free, in-the-moment denial untility (perhaps a substitute for those who shun alcohol but need a boost to make it easy) for folks who don't have the intestinal fortitude, or heart, or self-responsibility to say it face-to-face, even over the phone. 

Distance, and emotional distance, for them, is the great equalizer...so what better way than to bypass the other.

It's too bad that one doesn't have to look into a mirror, at themselves, while they use this "easy out" through a direct to voice mail, cowardly strategy.

"Sly"...hmmm. Delusional...more probably.

In our culture today, however, neither shocking, nor surprising.

posted on Sunday, August 10, 2008



Post a Comment

Note: This blog uses a 2-click comment system to combat spam. After you submit your comment below, you will be prompted to click a second button to complete the posting process.