sign up to get blog posts by email

Privacy Policy

Email cgreen [at] trustedadvisor [dot] com
@CharlesHGreen on twitter

Recent Comments

Trusted Tweets

Blogroll

Blogchive

Charles H. Green's Trust Matters
previous entry | return to blog index | next entry

Trust and Social Networking

by Charles H. Green on Sunday, March 4, 2007 (post #79)

Social networking on the web is hot. Many sites talk about trust. They tell us something about trust in cyberspace—and about trust in general.

Think four archetypes: Zagat’s, Amazon, eBay, and LinkedIn.

1. Zagat’s started off-line. It presents reviews by the "regular folks"—we trust it because the reviewers are presumably unbiased, in a way that commercial directories presumably aren’t. Zagat’s gains trust through clean motives of “people like me.”

2. Amazon has a recommender system—we trust it because we believe their massive databases dependably predict our likes.

3. eBay developed seller ratings. You can trust the person you buy from online because of their reputation among other previous buyers.

3. LinkedIn networks you to others by degrees of separation (a la the Kevin Bacon game) to others. You know Bill, I know you, ergo you can introduce me to Bill’s cousin’s friend. This works on the principle of personal relationships.

The social networks recombine these four types of DNA.

TrustedOpinion.com combines movies, music and restaurant reviews with an “x-degrees of separation” taxonomy. LinkedIn meets Zagat’s.

Crowdstorm.com measures the “buzz” around products, get “points,” and also allows you to rate “trusted” reviewers. LinkedIn meets eBay.

Digg and del.icio.us review content a la eBay meets Amazon—combining massive databases and reputations.

Each type has drawbacks.

1. The “people like me” approach gets hard to sustain at scale; when you get thousands of “people like me,” they aren’t—they’re the crowd.

2. The crowd system—Amazon's approach of masses of people dependably predicting our likes—depends on large numbers. Can the data be compromised? Sure. See the “let’s make my book #1” schemes, a la American Idol call storming.

3. The eBay-type ratings system is more obviously subject to hacking. See Wired for a good article on hacking reputation sites.

4. The Linked-In model has the great virtue of being based on super-high bandwidth connection—real people we actually know. The trouble is, personal trust has a high decay rate. It’s one thing to ask you to introduce me to your friend; it’s quite another to do so in order to meet his friend.

It’s in this arena that the internet falls down, even laughably, when it tries to promote trust. Consider Opinity and Rapleaf.

From Opinity's site:

Create a powerful and portable Opinity profile and be trusted! Using your Opinity profile, you can bring your already established reputation to any new site you want. Build your reputation quickly and gain trust.

And you gotta love Rapleaf:

Rapleaf is a portable ratings system for commerce. You can look people up before you buy or sell, and rate them afterwards.
Rate people and they will be encouraged to rate you back. Before long, your Rapleaf profile will reveal you for the honest person that you are. After all, it is more profitable to be ethical.


Do you trust a website to tell you how much to trust someone who has had his friends email in to say how trustworthy he is so that he can make more money by appearing to be trusted?

Lessons from all this:

1. The best trust isn’t very transferable
2. Deep digital trust is a tradeoff for breadth; trusting you to sell me a book doesn't mean I'll introduce you to my daughter
3. Saying “I’m trustworthy” means you aren’t
4. As in the meatosphere, all is not what it seems.

Over 12,000 people have taken our Trust Quotient quiz. Check out the NEW VERSION and learn your Trust Temperament.

Charles H. Green is founder and CEO of Trusted Advisor Associates LLC; read more about Charlie at http://trustedadvisor.com/cgreen/

You can follow him on twitter @CharlesHGreen

Tweet this post!


posted in Trust in Leadership Development and Strategy, Trust-based Selling, Building Trusted Advisors

3 Trackbacks

trackback url: http://trustedadvisor.com/trackback.php?id=118

» Mary's Blog, That Annoying Buzzing Sound: Social Media

For those of you who have actually heard the terms, “Social Media” and “Social Networking” – here are two excellent posts to help cut through the buzzing hype. Charles Green on Trust and Social Networking. and Susan Getg...

» Mopsos, Customer trust is too serious to leave it to marketing and sales

Interesting post on Trust Matters" href="http://trustedadvisor.com/blog/118/">Trusted Advisor Associates > Trust Matters 1. The best trust isn’t very transferable 2. Deep digital trust is a tradeoff for breadth; trusting you to sell me a book doesn't me

» Networking Carnival, The Networking Carnival - 6th Edition

Hey, Welcome back to the Networking Carnival. There are some good submissions for April.


6 Comments

jobsatisfaction said

peekface.com

This was a nice blog. I actually agree with what you are saying.


There are also alot of job comment sights out there like www.peekface.com, coderific.com, and trenchmice.com.


The whole social networking is also pretty hot at jobster.com and vault.com as well. Nice article.

posted on Monday, March 5, 2007

Charlie (Green) said

www.trustedadvisor.com/blog

Thanks JobSat, I hadn't realized how many networking sites there were in the employment area.  Hot indeed.

posted on Tuesday, March 6, 2007

isabella mori said

http://www.moritherapy.com

you'r so right.  there is no easier way to spot a suspicious person than to hear them say, "trust me!".  trust needs to be earned.  i always tell my clients that i don't expect them to trust me from the get-go.  why should they?  they don't know me.  all i'm asking is to give us some time so that we can get to know, and hopefully trust each other.

posted on Thursday, March 15, 2007

Andrew Power said

Thanks for the insight. I'm currently undergoing immersion-learning with iNetworking (will that catch on you think?) - and you outline my reservations. really clearly.

Plus - the links are more great fodder.

Cheers.

posted on Saturday, April 7, 2007

Stephan ten Kate said

www.stephantenkate.nl/thesis

A little late reply, but I truly underline your interesting thoughts and the classification of the four archetypes. My MSc. thesis results suggest that online trustworthiness assessments have little to do with the simplistic view of merely using online rating, testimonials and/or recommendations.

Instead, the trustworthiness dimensions within social networking sites do not differ from dimensions in real life. As such, users of social networking sites do have an implicit and deliberate arrangement of trustworthiness assessments, based on indication of ability, integrity, benevolence and social dimensions.

I also agree with Isabella; trust has to be earned. Being trustworthy is one step, but that's not the same as being trusted.

posted on Sunday, March 22, 2009

Charlie (Green) said

www.trustedadvisor.com/trustmatters

Stephan, I'd love to see your thesis.  Email or call me, OK?  I recently gave a speech that updated a few ideas since a year ago when I wrote this.  I'm glad to hear our thoughts move in the same general direction.

posted on Sunday, March 22, 2009



Post a Comment

Note: This blog uses a 2-click comment system to combat spam. After you submit your comment below, you will be prompted to click a second button to complete the posting process.