Thursday, August 21, 2008
Carnival of Trust

 Trust Matters RSS

sign up here to receive blog posts by email
Privacy Policy


Email cgreen [at] trustedadvisor [dot] com

Recent Comments

People Are Talking

Blogroll

Blogchive

Third-Party Blog Services


Charles H. Green's Trust Matters

previous entry | return to blog index | next entry

Fear and Loathing at the Office

by Charles H. Green on Thursday, January 18, 2007 (post #53)


Business Week’s cover story (Jan. 22, 2007 issue) is called “Sweet Revenge: the Power of Retribution, Spite and Loathing in the World of Business.

It’s a fun read, dishing classic stories ranging from how Cornelius Vanderbilt got even (“I won’t sue you, for the law is too slow. I’ll ruin you”), to Katzenberg vs. Eisner (Hollywood dustups are the most entertaining) to Michael Dell vs. Steve Jobs (the jury’s still out on this one, though as of today Jobs has the edge).

There are a few insights: "The simplest way to create a culture is to pick an enemy," says Garnett [CEO of Ingres, and one of many enemies Oracle’s Larry Ellison appears to have crated over the years.] "We have an enemy: It's Oracle."

And, “Revenge is a response to a perceived injustice or what psychologists call narcissistic injury, known to you and me as a wounded ego. This reaction is often acute in entrepreneurs or members of family businesses, whose sense of self-worth is bound to their businesses.”

But for the most part, this article describes, rather than diagnoses. But that’s not because the topic is without implication.
The incidence of revenge, and its motivational power, stand in contradiction to what business education describes as the way things get done.

College business courses and MBA programs teach rational decision-making; hypotheses and evidence, decision trees, net present value, hurdle and discount rates, the 4Ps. Not much time on dealing with vengeful bosses or peers.

People have strong feelings—revenge, love, lust, justice—which affect not just the workplace, but top-level strategies and the makeup of entire industries. Yet this is not, for the most part, taught.

It’s not taught to chemistry majors either.  Or actuaries.  But we expect it of business—I think of business as practical, applied economics.  Yet increasingly it is the theory that is taught, not the application.  (See also my posting  “Harvard Business School 30 Years Later: Bring Back Joe”).

Teaching theory alone is like learning a language solely through the dictionary.  Should business explain the world, or teach about managing in it?  The former doesn’t guarantee the latter.

I’m for teaching people to change the world, not just understand it. Vengeance 101, anybody?



Charles H. Green, author of Trust-Based Selling and co-author of The Trusted Advisor, is a consultant and speaker on trust issues for some of the world's best companies. He has written about trust in business relationships at Trust Matters since 2006. Read more...


posted in Building Trusted Advisors, Trust-based Selling, Trust in Leadership Development and Strategy

3 Trackbacks

trackback url: http://trustedadvisor.com/trackback.php?id=80

» BizzBites.com, Fear and Loathing at the Office

Business is taught as a cut and dried discipline of facts, numbers, charts and bloodless decisions, but decisions are actually often made for visceral reasons like revenge. Can any business education that doesn't take this into account really students fo

» StartUp Spark, Lucky Number 7 - The Carnival of Entrepreneurs

Charles Green presents Fear and Loathing at the Office. Makes you want to visit Vegas doesn’t it? Charles is wondering if there’s a place in business education for elements of emotion; vengeance, revenge and all that fun stuff. Interesting read.

» Who Learns?, Education Carnival - January 23, 2007

Welcome to the January 23, 2007 edition of education carnival.



4 Comments

Philip J. McGee said

www.wallstreetgroup.com

Charlie,

I don’t know that getting even is neurologically implanted in our pleasure zones but I do know from personal experience that it really gets to taste pretty awful over time. Not only that but, again my experience, it takes the eye off the ball and leads, I believe, to eventual disaster of some kind.

It (revenge)appears somehow to be in violation of the laws of Karma.

posted on Saturday, January 20, 2007

Shaula Evans said

Charlie, if you (and your readers) haven't seen it before, I highly recommend Gerard Depardieu's 1998 mini-series portrayal of The Count of Monte Cristo for a powerful refutation of "Vengance 101."

posted on Sunday, January 21, 2007

Charles H. Green said

www.trustedadvisor.com/blog

Phil and Shaula,

Thanks for the comments, with which I totally agree.

It occurs to me on re-reading the post, I hope no one understands it to say I'm in favor of "Revenge 101" as a normative proposition. 

Rather, we should have business courses that talk about the human condition—emotions like revenge, as well as  generosity—so that all people in business can recognize the powerful role—for bad and for good—that emotions play in the workplace.

I didn't see the mini-series, but it sounds like that would be a powerful example of the right kind of material for such a course.

 

posted on Sunday, January 21, 2007

Paul emerson said

Four out of 10 begrudge the culture of the office leaver being expected to buy drinks for colleagues and one in three workers find workplace outings simply annoying.

posted on Wednesday, August 8, 2007



Post a Comment

Note: This blog uses a 2-click comment system to combat spam. After you submit your comment below, you will be prompted to click a second button to complete the posting process.