Charlie - I've thought a lot over the years about leadership vs. authority. Often those in positions of authority confuse having a higher place on the totem pole with "leadership," and often those lower down on the totem pole confusingly look to those with positional authority for leadership. As you/FW and HBR point out, leadership is about personal characteristics (which I've always thought of as personal authority). Best for leaders to have both positional and personal authority, but if you have to pick one over the other, personal authority is better.

With respect to the unexamined life not being worth living, I've always loved the comment by Peter DeVries (or Woody Allen or Robert Fulghum): "...the examined life is no picnic either."

Let's see...be yourself, conscious and self-aware, honest, authentic, come from integrity, i.e., your core values, have your eyes wide open, not wide shut, be willing to engage and listen, be interested in others, be self-disciplined....sounds like a hip-pocket guide for just walking the planet in  a state of well-be-ing and, then, by the way, you might be a leader, sales person, clerk, concierge, priest, poker player, cab driver, zoo keeper, sportsman or woman, president, writer, university professor...

More interesting, for me, how some folks need experts at Harvard to tell them how to human and humane in their relationships, how to "be" and  "do";  otherwise, what?, they may not "believe" it or practice it if it doesn't come from the "experts"?

To me, it's curious how how some need a "technology" just to be conscious, just to be human. Hmmm.

Charlie - Well, Folk Wisdom is certainly easier to digest than HBR-speak. I love the advice on "being authentic". (Note to self: work on being authentic today.) As Peter notes in his comment, isn't this the price of admission to life?

As for the "unexamined life not worth living." A mention of this always reminds me of the reply: "The examined life is no picnic, either." I've seen it attributed to Peter DeVries and Woody Allen. In any case, it always makes me smile.

Frank  Zappa said it many years ago, perhaps not eloquently, but still valid:

" Do you know what you are?
You are what you is
You is what you am
(A cow don't make ham...)
You ain't what you're not
So see what you got
You are what you is
An' that's all it 'tis "

Perhaps a tad obscure, but with further examination you'll find Zappa fits every criteria for true Leadership.

Cheers,

It doesn't get much better than when you can link Harvard Business Review with Frank Zappa and Woody Allen. 

And, for anyone who didn't pick it up, the "be what you is..." quote is from Mr. Wizard--not the TV scientist who died recently, but Mr. Wizard from the Rocky and Bullwinkle show.

As Peter seems to suggest, with that trio, what more validation can Harvard provide?  What more validation is necessary?

I've found that being authentic requires one to admit that no greater authority - or expert or teacher or adviser - in life exists... save one's own person.

At the same time, by admitting one's flaws... from the outset of any interaction... involving signs, symbols, words, images, feelings or perceptions - whether personal or interpersonal - keeps one grounded to the evidence of our common frailties.

Because I'm naturally averse to getting caught up in dramas... schemes... programs... systems... empirical points of view...  or authoritative stances... manufactured by others, I'm also mistrustful of words-to-the-wise, the holier-than-thou, and man-made machines.

All of which makes me empathetic to those neediest of people - including, but especially, myself.

Maybe tomorrow I'll throw these words up in the air and come up with something better...

... Because who knows what fun can be had by throwing caution to the wind?